Result 36 of 57
view 1 item at a timePacking List
Mentioned on this page:
Tombs and Monuments:
G 1451, G 2092a, G 2184, G 2185, G 2407, G 2415, G 2418, G 2420, G 2421, G 2422, G 5020-Annex, G 7110-7120, G 7130-7140, G 7560
G 1451, G 2092a, G 2184, G 2185, G 2407, G 2415, G 2418, G 2420, G 2421, G 2422, G 5020-Annex, G 7110-7120, G 7130-7140, G 7560
Remarks:
There is a question as to whether 36-5-32 (= 37.641, deaccessioned) is a statue of "Nezemuw" or "Inti". PL1 lists it as "Nezemuw", and this is supported in Reisner's unpubished 1942 "History of the Giza Necropolis" pp. 064 (alternate version), though written in margin in pencil is "inscribed on base Yenti (?)". In photo B8679 the inscription itself is in very faint ink by the right foot, no photo close-up of inscription. Drawing of inscription in the Object Register is also unclear. Conclusion is that it could possibly be "Nezemuw" which would make sense as it was found with the clearly inscribed 36-5-29. Cannot however rule out "Inti", this would be the only sourse of this name within G 2420. Incorrect field number: 26-5-42 should be 36-5-42
There is a question as to whether 36-5-32 (= 37.641, deaccessioned) is a statue of "Nezemuw" or "Inti". PL1 lists it as "Nezemuw", and this is supported in Reisner's unpubished 1942 "History of the Giza Necropolis" pp. 064 (alternate version), though written in margin in pencil is "inscribed on base Yenti (?)". In photo B8679 the inscription itself is in very faint ink by the right foot, no photo close-up of inscription. Drawing of inscription in the Object Register is also unclear. Conclusion is that it could possibly be "Nezemuw" which would make sense as it was found with the clearly inscribed 36-5-29. Cannot however rule out "Inti", this would be the only sourse of this name within G 2420. Incorrect field number: 26-5-42 should be 36-5-42
Field or ID Number: PL1







